Earlier this month, I joined the Board of Foretellix, a company whose mission is to make ADAS and autonomous systems safe. It is no small undertaking, but I am convinced Foretellix is very well positioned to achieve this goal. I wanted to share some of my thoughts and tell you why I decided to join Foretellix on this journey.
Earlier this month, I joined the Board of Foretellix, a company whose mission is to make ADAS and autonomous systems safe. It is no small undertaking, but I am convinced Foretellix is very well positioned to achieve this goal. I wanted to share some of my thoughts and tell you why I decided to join Foretellix on this journey.
Industry-Leading Platform Combines the Power of Foretellix Foretify™ and NVIDIA DRIVE Sim™ Addressing Mutual Customers’ Needs
Our first two OSC2 automation expert seminars were extremely successful, with hundreds of attendees and a lively exchange of information both in the Q&A sessions and on chat.
The challenge: The growing complexity of automated driving systems such as Lane Keep Assist, Lane Centering and Adaptive Cruise Control challenge existing verification and validation (V&V) methodologies used in the automotive industry. As these systems become more prevalent, bugs surface and failures occur.
Whether you are working on ADAS and about to move up to more advanced autonomous functions, or working on the long tail of L4 autonomy, one thing is for sure: you are about to face exponential growth in the number of scenarios you need to test in order to get your autonomous product out.
Increasingly, thought leaders and executives within the automotive industry have shared their concerns about the validity of miles and disengagements as metrics for safe deployment of autonomous vehicles, and some have started proposing alternative metrics.
We’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
